TERMS OF REFERENCE
Co-conduct Implementation Research on Two Agricultural Programmes in the Terai of Nepal
We are inviting applications from agricultural departments actively engaged with farmers and agricultural households in the Eastern Gangetic Plains or the Terai region of Nepal.
Background
Policies are key to holistic sectoral development in any economy. There is an understood gap between the design and implementation of policies in the Global South, including agricultural policies and programmes. This gap not only leads to poor returns on funds spent but also highlights intra-sectoral dissonance that fails to create lasting positive change in society.
This study is part of a larger multi-country comparative analysis of the implementation of farm and non-farm agricultural initiatives in the Eastern Gangetic Plains (EGP). For the analysis, two agricultural diversification programmes each in Bangladesh, India and Nepal are examined through primary qualitative data. The aim is to understand how the selected programmes are supposed to work and to identify the exact nodes of leakage in their Theory of Change (TOC).
The study is situated in the EGP of Nepal, where the ACIAR-funded RUPANTAR project remains active, specifically the Terai. Its findings might help provide tailored policy suggestions to government stakeholders on two active and key agricultural programmes in Bangladesh. The findings also add to the wider understanding of how to tailor agricultural policy delivery within heterogeneous contexts and institutional irregularities.
This survey will include two or three villages where the selected agricultural programmes have already been implemented. Ideally, the villages will be located where the ACIAR (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research) funded project, RUPANTAR, remains active, to align the study and its suggestions with the overall work conducted under the project.
The survey instrument will collect data on the actual implementation of the programmes and the underlying assumptions that build the associated Theory of Change (TOC) for each. We plan to collect data from all stakeholders involved on two key nodes of programme implementation: inputs and activities. These include policymakers, local bureaucrats, regional implementation bodies, field extension agents and beneficiary farmers. Qualitative data will be collected through in-person interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs).
The aim of this sub-study is to identify the factors limiting effective implementation of two agricultural diversification programmes in the Terai of Nepal.
The collaborator will actively co-engage with IFPRI in identifying and interviewing the villages and stakeholders to be surveyed for the study. This includes translating survey instruments, conducting short in-person stakeholder surveys (less than 30 minutes) and FGDs using CAPI, cleaning the translated data and sharing the data with IFPRI within 14 days of the start of the survey. Villages will be selected by IFPRI and the collaborator collectively.
The scope of collaboration is expected to be approximately for a duration of 45 days. Ideally, data will be collected by the end of November 2026, and all deliverables will be submitted to IFPRI by 15th December 2026.
The institution engaged for this assignment should demonstrate the following:
1) Translated word questionnaire considering adjustments to the context of Terai of Nepal
2) Translated CAPI program
3) Logistics manual
4) Pretest report
5) Data collection completed with ~35 stakeholder interviews/ FGDs
6) Data cleaning completed and all data cleaning revisions completed
7) Certified financial report
Interested firms are invited to apply for this advertisement, submitting complete company details as per the eligibility criteria, along with a detailed budget proposal and the CV of the lead consultant.
We review listings for quality, but organizations may update or amend a posting at any time, so confirm the role and closing date on the organization’s official site before applying. No genuine employer charges a fee to apply, interview, or process an application — treat any request for payment as a scam. If a detail looks wrong or the posting seems fraudulent, report this job.