Skip to Job Description
TOR: She Belongs in School Project
Save the Children International (Save the Children)
Full-time
Expired
Plan Next Steps
Posted 3 weeks ago
Job Description

Terms of Reference: She Belongs in School (SBIS) Project 

Endline Evaluation

1.0 Project Summary

Summary Indicators

Description

Type of Assessment

Endline Evaluation

Project start and end

11 August 2021 – 31 July 2026

Project duration 

5 Years

Thematic Areas

Education, Gender Equality

Project location 

Nampula and Niassa

Donors

Global Affairs Canada

Estimated beneficiaries

72,440 direct beneficiaries and intermediaries

154,975 indirect beneficiaries

Overall objectives of the project

Adolescent girls (10-19 years) are empowered to exercise their rights to education and enhance their learning outcomes in Mozambique

2.0 Project Background

Save the Children’s “She Belongs in School” (SBIS) project is a 5-year initiative (August 2021 to July 2026) to enhance the empowerment and learning outcomes of adolescent girls (10-19 years) in the provinces of Nampula and Niassa in Mozambique. This ultimate outcome will be achieved by working across the socio-ecological model with rights-holders (adolescent girls), responsibility-holders (their families and communities), and duty-bearers (school administrators, teachers, and education authorities), to tackle the root causes of gender inequality, specifically the underlying harmful social norms, practices, and behaviours that contribute to girls’ low rates of education access and achievement. The project’s primary beneficiaries will be adolescent girls (aged 10-19), both in and out-of-school, who are at risk of not realizing their right to education. Particular attention will be paid to girls who face intersectional discrimination, including girls (and boys) with disabilities, and girls living in remote, hard-to-reach areas. The project will achieve this ultimate outcome by improving behaviours and practices amongst families, husbands, and communities to promote and support adolescent girls’ rights, particularly the right to education (1100); increasing self-belief, decision-making power and leadership exercised by adolescent girls to pursue education (1200); and enhancing the provision of safe and supportive learning environments that build the skills and competencies of adolescent girls (1300). 

She Belongs in School (SBIS) will be delivered by Save the Children (SC) along with 222222partners who each bring unique geographic and operational footprints and technical specialities in disability inclusion (AJODEMO), girls’ empowerment approaches (Girl Move Academy), and youth engagement (UATAF, Progresso). The project will be delivered in Mecanhelas, Mandimba and Cuamba districts in Niassa Province, and Muecate, Membe, Erati and Nacaroa districts in Nampula Province. 

The project employs an integrated, multi-sectoral, cross-cutting and gender-transformative approach to address the root causes of gender inequality for highly marginalized groups. To achieve its goal of enhancing the empowerment and learning outcomes of adolescent girls in Nampula and Niassa, the project is employing the socio-ecological model and SC’ Girls’ Empowerment Model and has defined intersectionality as a core approach. These approaches are considered essential for gender transformative programming. The project will undertake different strategies at interpersonal, community and school/institutional levels to enable a positive environment and transform unequal power dynamics and harmful social norms so that girls are able to develop agency and advance in education. 

The tables below provide a detailed breakdown of the direct and indirect reach of the SBIS project that includes 72,440 direct beneficiaries (32,506 girls, 20,116 boys, 11,380 women, 8,438 men) in the target regions, in addition to 154,975 indirect beneficiaries (53,379 girls, 43,592 boys, 29,245 women, 28,759 men). 

Direct Beneficiaries + Intermediaries

Girls

Boys

Women

Men

Total

Direct Beneficiaries

 

 

 

 

 

In-school children (IS)

20,072

10.262

-

-

31.234

Out-of-school children (OOS)

10,734

9,054

-

-

19,788

Caregivers

8,673

5,272

13,945

Vulnerable households with OOS children

-

-

1,245

1.050

2,295

Intermediaries

 

 

 

 

 

Community & Religious Leaders

20

482

502

Teachers

-

-

849

1,284

2,133

Initiation rite providers

-

-

230

150

380

Education technicians

-

-

13

25

38

Government stakeholders

-

-

350

175

525

Civil society organization representatives

800

800

-

-

1,600

TOTAL: 

Direct Beneficiaries + Intermediaries

32,506

20,116

11,380

8.438

72,440

Indirect Beneficiaries

Girls

Boys

Women

Men

Total

Other household members of vulnerable households who receive monthly unrestricted cash transfers

3,443

3,442

3,000

1,590

11,475

Community and religious leaders sensitized by other community and religious leaders

-

-

40

964

1,004

Caregivers and siblings of IS and OOS intervention children 

49,936

40,150

26,205

26,205

142,496

TOTAL : Indirect Beneficiaries

53,379

43,592

29,245

28,759

154,975

3.0 Overall Scope of the Endline Evaluation

The primary objective of the endline evaluation is to assess the extent to which the project has achieved its intended outcomes—ultimate, intermediate, and immediate—as well as its overall goal, as articulated in the project results framework. The evaluation will measure progress against established baseline values and targets and identify key factors that have facilitated or constrained the achievement of results.

The evaluation will generate robust evidence on changes attributable to the project, including both intended and unintended effects, and will provide a comparative analysis against baseline findings. In addition, the endline evaluation will document actionable lessons learned and develop strategic, evidence-based recommendations to inform future programming, support organizational learning, and guide decision-making.

3.1 Specific Scope of the Terms of Reference

Save the Children seeks to engage an evaluation Consultant to produce the endline evaluation for the She Belongs in School (SBIS) project. The Consultant’s scope of work will be limited to data analysis and the preparation of the endline evaluation report.

The Consultant will be provided with finalized data collection tools, an indicator analysis plan, cleaned quantitative datasets, pre-tabulated analysis tables, qualitative transcripts, and relevant project documentation. These materials will be produced and compiled by a separate consultant responsible for data collection. The evaluation Consultant will use these inputs to conduct rigorous analysis and develop a high-quality endline evaluation report in line with the objectives outlined in this Terms of Reference.

3.2 Performance Measurement Review Indicators

Data will be collected for the following 14 project indicators: 

 

Outcome Statements

Indicators

Ultimate Outcome

1000: Enhanced empowerment and learning outcomes of adolescent girls (10-19) in the provinces of Nampula and Niassa

 

 

 

1000.1: % of girls with strong empowerment scores on the Girls’ Empowerment Model Index (IS/OOS)

 

Intermediate Outcome

1100: Improved behaviours and practices among families, husbands, and communities (including religious leaders) that promote and support women and girls’ rights, particularly the right to education

 

1100.1: % of community members/religious leaders and caregivers who report the existence of harmful gender norms related to girls’ rights

1100.2: % of girls (and boys) who report they have received support from their caregivers to pursue education (IS)

 

1200: Increased self-belief, decision-making power and leadership exercised by adolescent girls to pursue education

1200.1: % of girls (and boys) who demonstrate positive self-concept, growth mindset and positive aspirations for their future development and/or education (IS/OOS)

1200.2: % of girls (and boys) who report they have decision-making power over their education and ASRH decisions (IS/OOS)

 

1300: Enhanced provision of safe and supportive learning environments that build the skills and competencies of adolescent girls and are responsive to their specific needs

1300.2a): % of girls who report safe and supportive learning environments in target schools focusing on corporal punishment, bullying experiences, exposure to gender-based violence (IS)

1300.2b): % of girls who report safe and supportive learning environments in target schools focusing on the physical safety of school environment: security, WASH, external factors, emergency planning

 

Immediate Outcome

1110: Improved attitudes of community influencers and caregivers to promote girls rights to education, equal care work, ASRHR & prevention of SGBV (including CEFM)

1120: Improved willingness and skills of caregivers, and community leaders to promote gender equality and girls' rights, particularly to education, equal care work and ASRHR

1130: Improved capacity of families to address material/financial barriers to girls' education

 

1110.1: % of caregivers (m/f) who support reform of initiation ceremonies to enable girls to stay in school and delay marriage

1110.2: % of community members/religious leaders and caregivers (m/f) who hold positive attitudes towards girls’ rights and gender equality 

1120.1: % of caregivers (m/f) who hold positive attitudes towards girls’ continued education (secondary and/or tertiary)

1130.1: % of caregivers (m/f) who report material/financial barriers prevents their girls from attending school

 

1210: Increased knowledge and attitudes of adolescent girls on life skills, ASRHR, MHM, prevention of SGBV, and gender equality/rights principles

1220: Increased participation of adolescent girls in decision-making forums on girls' rights, particularly to education & ASRHR

1230: Increased access of adolescent girls to resources and services that support their right to education

1210.1: % of girls and boys who demonstrate positive attitudes of gender equality principles and child rights (IS/OOS)

1220.1: % of girls (and boys) representatives who have actively participated in the forums (CPCs, Children’s parliament)

1230.1: % of girls who report having sufficient school and MHM materials (IS)

 

4.0 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY

The endline evaluation will be a summative evaluation applying a non‑experimental, pre–post design and a mixed‑methods approach. To address the stated evaluation objectives and assess overall project performance, the methodology will integrate rigorous quantitative and qualitative analyses. Quantitative analysis will compare baseline (pre‑test) and endline (post‑test) indicator values using appropriate statistical techniques to assess changes over time. Qualitative analysis will be used to contextualize, complement, and triangulate quantitative findings, providing deeper insight into the project’s contribution to observed outcomes and the factors influencing results. 

4.1 Data Collection Methods

The endline evaluation will utilize the baseline data collection tools, with data collected from the following respondent groups: 

  • Adolescent survey conducted with in- and out-of-school adolescent girls and boys aged 10-14 years and 15-19 years. 
  • Caregiver survey conducted with male and female caregivers with an unmarried son or daughter 10-19 years of age
  • Leader survey conducted with male and female community leaders including religious and traditional leaders, municipal leaders, business leaders
  • Child Parliamentarian survey conducted with girls and boys who are members of the child parliament
  • Focus group discussions (FGDs) with in- and out-of-school adolescent girls and boys 10-14 years and 15-19 years, female and male caregivers with a daughter 10-19 years

4.2 Sampling Frame 

The sampling frame will cover two regions: Nampula and Niassa. A purposive sampling approach will be applied to select respondents who have directly participated in project activities, including beneficiaries (children and adolescents), their respective caregivers, and community leaders. The sample will be systematically disaggregated by gender (male, female), age group (10–14 years; 15–19 years), and school status (in‑school and out‑of‑school) to ensure adequate representation across key analytical categories. To enable robust comparability over time, the endline evaluation sampling framework will replicate, as closely as possible, the sampling design and parameters used in the baseline study.

4.2.1 Surveys

 

Total

Nampula

Niassa

Beneficiary Group

F

M

T

F

M

T

F

M

T

Survey (45-60 min per survey)

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

In-school (10-14 years)*

384

384

768

230

230

460

154

154

308

In-school (15-19 years)*

384

384

768

230

230

460

154

154

308

Out-of-school (10-14 years)*

384

384

768

230

230

460

154

154

308

Out-of-school (15-19 years)*

384

384

768

230

230

460

154

154

308

Caregivers with a daughter/son (10-19 years)

384

384

768

230

230

460

154

154

308

Community leaders – e.g. Religious and Traditional Leaders, CSO leaders

100

100

200

60

60

120

40

40

80

Child Parliamentarians

50

50

100

30

30

60

20

20

40

TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE

2,070

2,070

4,140

 

 

 

* Sample must include children with disabilities – 5% of the sample. 

4.2.2 Focus Group Discussions

FGDs will be conducted with the following groups to provide more in-depth information on several themes. 

 

Total

Nampula

Niassa

Beneficiary Group

F

M

T

F

M

T

F

M

T

# of FGDs (8-10 participants)

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

In-school (10-14 years)

4

4

8

2

2

4

2

2

4

In-school (15-19 years)

4

4

8

2

2

4

2

2

4

Out-of-school (10-14 years)

4

4

8

2

2

4

2

2

4

Out-of-school (15-19 years)

4

4

8

2

2

4

2

2

4

Caregivers with a daughter 10-19 years

2

2

4

2

2

4

2

2

4

TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE

18

18

36

5.0 Roles and Responsibilities

5.1 Consultant

The Consultant will be responsible for the technical execution and timely completion of the endline evaluation analysis and reporting. Specific responsibilities include:

  • Reviewing all relevant project documentation to inform the evaluation analysis, including but not limited to the Project Implementation Plan (PIP), Logic Model, Performance Measurement Framework, Baseline Study, annual and semi‑annual narrative and financial reports, work plans, annual budgets and expenditures, data collection tools, and the endline indicator analysis plan.
  • Using the baseline study as the primary reference framework for endline indicator analysis to ensure methodological consistency and comparability over time, with findings systematically disaggregated by gender, age group, school status, and geographic region.
  • Conducting rigorous quantitative and qualitative data analysis based on datasets and materials provided by Save the Children, applying appropriate analytical techniques in line with the approved analysis plan.
  • Preparing and delivering high‑quality endline evaluation outputs in accordance with agreed timelines, incorporating feedback from Save the Children, and ensuring that all deliverables meet professional evaluation and reporting standards.

The Consultant is accountable for the quality, completeness, and timeliness of all deliverables outlined in Section 5.3.

5.2 Save the Children 

Save the Children will be responsible for providing technical oversight, coordination, and the necessary inputs to enable the Consultant to carry out the assignment effectively. Save the Children will provide the Consultant with the following data and materials:

  • Cleaned quantitative datasets in SPSS and Excel formats
  • Pre‑tabulated analysis tables for all surveys
  • A detailed indicator analysis plan outlining calculation methodologies
  • English-language transcripts from focus group discussions (FGDs)

In addition, Save the Children will provide access to key project documentation, including:

  • Baseline Study
  • Project Implementation Plan (PIP)
  • Logic Model
  • Performance Measurement Framework (including indicators)
  • Annual and semi‑annual narrative and financial reports

Save the Children will also be responsible for reviewing draft deliverables, consolidating feedback, and providing timely comments to support the Consultant in meeting agreed deadlines.

5.3 Consultant Deliverables 

The Consultant will be responsible for producing and submitting the following deliverables to Save the Children:

  • A detailed inception work plan outlining the proposed analytical approach, timeline, and a preliminary table of contents for the endline evaluation report.
  • An initial draft endline evaluation report in English, presenting analyzed findings aligned with the project results framework.
  • A final endline evaluation master report that compares endline findings against baseline values and project targets, and that clearly articulates conclusions, lessons learned, and actionable recommendations to inform future program design and implementation.

All deliverables will be submitted in accordance with timelines agreed upon at the start of the consultancy and will be subject to review and approval by Save the Children.

5.4 Management and Reporting

The Consultant will report directly to the Senior MEAL Advisor at Save the Children Canada, who will hold overall responsibility for managing and overseeing the consultancy. Save the Children Canada will establish a schedule of regular (weekly) check‑in meetings with the Consultant to monitor progress, address emerging issues, and ensure alignment with expectations related to data analysis and report drafting.

5.5 Duration of Consultancy: 

The consultant is expected to initiate data analysis upon receipt of data no later than July 2026. The work is expected to be completed no later than end of August 2026. 

6.0 Payment Schedule

Payment to the consultant shall be done in accordance with normal procedures of Save the Children Canada. The payment schedule will be as follows:

  • 1st Payment: 20% upon signing of contract and submission of Work Plan
  • 2nd Payment: 30% upon submission of the first draft of the Endline Evaluation for review
  • 3rd Payment / Final payment: 50% upon submission of final and approved Endline Evaluation

7.0 Qualification and Experience

The consultant must possess strong technical expertise in mixed‑methods evaluation analysis and reporting, with demonstrated experience conducting endline evaluations for large‑scale, donor‑funded development projects. Given the analytical and reporting‑focused nature of this assignment, the consultant is expected to meet the following minimum qualifications:

  • Postgraduate degree (Master’s or higher) in social sciences, evaluation, statistics, education, gender studies, or a related field.
  • Minimum 7 years of professional experience conducting mixed‑methods analysis and producing endline and/or baseline evaluation reports for development programs.
  • Strong proficiency in quantitative data analysis, including experience working with large datasets and applying appropriate statistical techniques for pre–post comparison, using software such as SPSS, Stata, R, or equivalent.
  • Demonstrated experience in qualitative data analysis, including systematic coding and synthesis of FGDs and key informant data using qualitative analysis software (e.g., NVivo, ATLAS.ti) or comparable approaches.
  • Proven experience conducting evaluations aligned with results frameworks and performance measurement systems, including comparison against baseline values and project targets.
  • Technical expertise in education, gender equality, and/or adolescent and child rights, with strong understanding of gender‑transformative programming.
  • Prior experience working in or on evaluations/programs in Mozambique, with demonstrated understanding of the country’s education and gender equality context.
  • Experience with donor‑funded evaluations (e.g., Global Affairs Canada or similar) and familiarity with donor reporting standards.
  • Strong analytical writing skills and a demonstrated ability to synthesize complex quantitative and qualitative findings into clear, evidence‑based conclusions and actionable recommendations.
  • Proven ability to deliver high‑quality outputs within tight timelines and respond constructively to feedback.
  • Fluency in written and spoken English required

8.0 Application Process

Applications for the consultancy must include the following:

  1. Detailed proposal clearly demonstrating a thorough understanding of the ToR including the following: 
  1. Demonstrate previous experience in coordinating and administering studies of a similar nature, 
  2. A proposed timeframe detailing schedule of work 
  1. A financial proposal with a detailed breakdown of all costs including consultancy fees/costs.
  2. Curriculum Vitae(s) of the consultant team outlining relevant experience.
  3. Names and contact information of three references who can be contacted regarding relevant experience.
  4. A copy of a previous report of a similar nature undertaken on: a) baseline study; OR b) endline evaluation. 

Complete applications should be submitted electronically in English to the following address: gtimpl@savethechildren.ca with the header: SBIS Endline Evaluation

Closing date for submission of the application package is end of business day on: Monday, May 18, 2026.

{{waiting}}
This position is no longer open.